Tim Kaine’s Racial Profiling Jury Practices Exposed

For decades we have seen the ways that extreme liberal ideology is used to divide a population. We have example after example of this in South American nations.

Unhappy citizens are fed a steady diet of militant leftist influences that are used to push a victimhood narrative with the hope of sparking a civil war to result in a military coup d’etat. Then, America swoops in and installs a dictator of our choosing and transforms the country in question into an unstable regime of slavery and oppression.

Today, the formula is being used in the US. It’s been in the works for ages, but now it’s here. We see it in the liberal media lambasting ranchers in the midwest as the Federal government illegally takes over their land. We see it in the Black Lives Matter movement, a terrorist organization funded by billionaire liberal George Soros, and thinly disguised as a civil rights movement.

We see it in the form of the constant attempts to shame and degrade white people, calling them racist simply for being white, using every effort to remove every shred of pride from anyone with too little melanin under their skin.

It is coupled with non-stop efforts to take away citizens weapons and shame gun ownership so that when radicalized mobs and military police roll into your town, you will offer no resistance.

Now, Hillary Clinton has made a champion of leftist race-baiting the companion to her bid for the White House- Tim Kaine.

It has recently come to light that in the late 1980s, Kaine ejected white people from a jury raising questions as to what racist policies he would support as Hillary’s Vice President.

Kaine wrote an op-ed piece in 1989, for the Richmond University Law Review, wherein he wrote that his objective in that case was “to increase the chances the jury would have no less than one black juror.”

His actions were brought to national attention recently by The Daily Beast, and he has received both praise and blame over it. A 1991 Supreme Court ruling stated that eligible jurors may not be barred from serving on a jury for reasons based only on ethnicity or race. Nevertheless- race-based jury selection is still an ongoing practice in court cases all across the country, according to The Daily Beast.

Stephen Bright, a representative of the Southern Center for Human Rights said, “Kaine was well ahead of the curve on the issue. He was out there before the Supreme Court, and few others had raised these ethical racial issues that he had raised.”

Kaine even admitted in his article that race-based jury selection was “ethically suspect.” He went on to say, “The idea that ordinary stereotypes contain some truth can’t, as a matter of fact, be entirely denied. Even though conventional wisdom on the ways different racial and ethnic groups respond to the facts of a civil or criminal trial has not been able to stand up to statistical studies- the idea that jurors might be more inclined to favor a member of his or her own race is not of necessity a racist presumption entirely unsupported by evidence.”

If this statement seems unduly complicated, it is. What Kaine is saying is that even though it’s wrong to make jury selections based on skin color we know we can skew the outcome of court cases the way we want by selecting jury members based on race.

The underlying premise of his statement and his tack is that he, and people like him, have a monopoly on truth and morality- and that because of that moral monopoly- they should be able to break the commonly agreed upon taboo against making race-based decisions that affect the lives of possibly innocent people.

Fortunately, many people recognize the troubling implications of this kind of racism.

Ron Rotunda, an attorney, and professor at Chapman University School of Law said, “Does he actually believe blacks think so radically differently, that they will be prejudiced in the way they will vote on a jury? I would hope, like anyone else, they would endeavor to follow the judge’s directions and to try to be a fair and honest as possible. That is what we hope, and expect people will do, regardless of skin color. It’s really very offensive to say, ‘I want black people there because I know what black people are going to do.’ That is very troubling.”

It is extremely troubling to think that such pseudo-academic, and ultimately Marxist racism might only be a few short months away from taking the most important office in the country.

~American Liberty Report


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *