For supporters of Republican presidential nominee Donald Trump, the prospect of a rigged election is the capstone to an incredibly challenging campaign season that’s featured dirty tricks, scandals, smears and surprises that have shocked even veteran political observers such as Roger Stone and Pat Caddell.
The depths to which the campaign of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton has been willing to stoop appear to be getting lower every day. WikiLeaks has published hacked emails that have revealed devastatingly foul play not just from Hillary while she was Secretary of State, but also from her staffers as well as her campaign manager John Podesta.
Combine that with and the FBI’s ongoing investigation of Clinton’s private email server and reports about all the illicit activities of the Clinton Foundation, it would seem like there’s no way under ordinary circumstances Clinton could limp to a popular or electoral victory if this was an ordinary presidential race.
But it’s not; this contest has been a race like no other, and there are some very heavy hitters supporting the opposition, making it very lopsided (from a money and media perspective) in Clinton’s favor at this point.
One of the most feared and influential of Hillary Clinton’s donors is billionaire financier George Soros, and his eagerness to meddle in this election hasn’t met any bounds thus far. One of the most insidious ways Soros and the Democrats appear to be ready to beat a path to victory at all costs is with rigged voting machines.
Voting machines bearing the names of Smartmatic and Sequoia Voting Systems have ties to Soros and his Open Society Foundations, which are deeply entrenched in advancing a globalist, economically disruptive agenda.
There are also stories about other machines bearing the names of Election Systems & Software (ES&S) and Diebold possibly being rigged or being rig-able. For years, experts and analysts have pointed out connections between companies selling voting machines and campaigns of various political candidates, but because of the importance of this election, those connections need to be scrutinized more than ever.
When Donald Trump claims that the election is “rigged,” he’s without a doubt telling the truth — there is ample evidence that at a minimum, many of these machines are sold by companies based in countries and owned by entities outside the United States.
In the worst cases, these companies may have connections to Marxist or Socialist governments and/or financiers such as Soros or others, who seek to disrupt the global economy for financial gain. Anyone who has a vested interest in politics at all should not be in the business of manufacturing voting machines.
And certainly, electronic voting machines do not have a valid place in today’s politics; any such network of machines where results are tabulated on a remote computer with no paper trail being offered is practically begging to be “cracked” or “backdoored” in favor of whichever group or political party that’s willing to pay the price for such a fraud.
If you don’t think this can happen in the United States — think again. If you don’t believe the statements in this article are true, do your own research; most of the facts are easily available via Google.
Now that information about these systems and machines is coming to light, it’s beginning to dawn on voters that their votes — depending on where and how they’re cast — may be marginalized, negated, reversed or simply not counted at all if processed using one of these rigged machines and/or networks.
When Donald Trump spoke of possibly not accepting the results of the election, dependent on its outcome, he was absolutely right in that Americans should not blithely accept pre-election poll numbers that are promulgated by an Establishment and a media that have been proven to be nearly 100 percent co-opted.
Already, the drumbeat of the mainstream media is growing louder with stories of an imminent Clinton victory even as the FBI has reopened their investigation into her email case and Attorney General Loretta Lynch has accused FBI Director James Comey of not playing ball with the Clinton-Obama Democrats.
The New York Times is practically running a ticker tape parade on its website, blaring that the chances of a Clinton victory are “91 percent.” Just don’t look too far behind the big black Establishment curtain, because you might not like what you see on the other side.
There have been reports of schools canceling classes over fears of Election Day violence. Certainly, there have been accusations from the Trump camp of Clinton campaign workers breaking election laws in multiple states.
Ad hoc observers have said that in some counties in Florida, for instance, many people have seen residents with Trump voting signs in their yards, with no Hillary signs to be seen at all. So if Hillary wins in such a locale, where do all her voters live?
But the real excitement in this race will come when the polling stations close and the results are tabulated; then we will almost surely know whether this election is an outright fraud or not.
Or if its results are out-of-sync with the massive crowds seen at Trump rallies and huge support shown for Trump online as voters view and comment on the nearly endless stream of Wikileaks emails, outrageous videos of Hillary Clinton’s public behavior and the morass of moral failures that encompasses the daily decisions of the Clinton clan as a whole.
If it appears that there’s been fraud — whether it’s vote fraud as was discussed in the infamous Project Veritas videos or election fraud as has been discussed in numerous articles and forums — you can expect that the American public won’t take it lying down.
There may be massive protests that may make the recent demonstrations by groups such as Black Lives Matter look like picnic outings. But worse for the Democrats — even if Hillary manages to squeak out an election victory — is the specter of impeachment hearings and/or an indictment of her (and possibly other members of her campaign and/or foundation).
Some lawmakers, such as Congressman Mo Brooks of Alabama, have openly discussed this possibility being initiated before Clinton can even take office. Certainly, voters should prepare to “dig in” in the event of such an action.
It’s long past time to “drain the swamp” in Washington — to use Donald Trump’s words — and if Clinton can be locked up in the process, so much the better.
Rumors have already floated around about Barack Obama possibly leaving the country in the case of a Trump victory. The only question is: would his flight be voluntary, or would it be that of a fugitive running from justice?
~American Liberty Report
