Deep State Leakers, Worried They’ll be Outed by Trump’s Order to Declassify Anything Related to Russian Collusion, Call Out Trump’s Directive

Right on cue, the wretched and unimpressive elites in America are suddenly telling us that it will be dangerous for you to see classified documents related to the Russiagate hoax. President Trump told William Barr to declassify anything he wants to, related to Russiagate.

He also directed the CIA and the FBI to fully cooperate with Barr as he investigates the failed coup attempt against the 45th president. It’s hilarious to watch the Deep State buffoons, who leak classified information to the media whenever it suits them, suddenly become deeply concerned that the public might see some classified information related to their clearly illegal activities.

The entire Robert Mueller witch hunt was predicated on former FBI Director James Comey leaking classified memos. In a snitty act of retaliation after Trump canned him, Comey took classified memos and gave them to a personal friend of his and directed that friend to leak the memos to the New York Times.

Comey was not prosecuted for this obvious violation of federal law because he didn’t leak the memos to the media.

The result of those memos being made public prompted Rod Rosenstein to appoint Robert Mueller as Special Counsel, within two days of Mueller begging President Trump for Comey’s job at the head of the FBI (which Trump rejected).

Senate Intelligence Committee aide James Wolfe had access to all kinds of sensitive classified information, as part of his duties on the committee. Wolfe’s access to classified intelligence was a goldmine of information for reporter Ali Watkins of Buzzfeed.

She was churning out articles left and right about nefarious “Russian spy” Carter Page, due to the fact that she was sleeping with Wolfe for classified intel.

When Wolfe was caught lying to the FBI about his relationship with reporter Watkins, he was sentenced to two months in jail. Buzzfeed’s source on the Intel Committee also dried up.

In a hilarious case of misdirection, the New York Times described the Wolfe-Watkins affair as, “the first known instance of the Justice Department going after a reporter’s data under President Trump.”

Grump old man and former CIA Director John Brennan told MSNBC that he’s worried about AG Barr releasing classified information “willy nilly” under this new directive. To illustrate the fact that he may actually be retarded, Brennan then proceeded to reveal highly classified intelligence on MSNBC. You know, as an example of how Barr might do something “willy nilly.”

Brennan explained to MSNBC viewers that the CIA has an extremely deep cover intelligence asset in the Kremlin. This individual is “very, very close” to Vladimir Putin. The CIA has cultivated this undercover source for years. This intelligence asset is the person who informed the CIA that the Russians wanted to “hack the election,” according to Brennan.

Then, Brennan goes on to express his deep concern and indeed, his fears that the reckless Attorney General William Barr will simply release a classified document that has this individual’s name printed on it.

Uh…

I don’t mean to nitpick, but didn’t John Brennan just reveal classified intelligence on MSNBC??

Five minutes before blabbermouth Brennan’s appearance, the Russians did not know that there is a deep cover CIA asset “very, very close” to Vladimir Putin. Now, they suddenly do know that there is a highly classified deep cover CIA asset “very, very close” to Putin.

They might not know the person’s name, but the Russians are definitely looking for the individual now. Attorney General William Barr didn’t reveal the existence of this CIA mole to the public. President Trump is not the one who put this CIA asset’s life in danger. John Brennan did that.

Putting the failed Russiagate attempted coup aside, shouldn’t Brennan be prosecuted for revealing classified information “willy nilly” on TV?

Is there some rule that says a former CIA Director can just blurt classified information out on MSNBC and that’s okay?

I’m pretty sure Brennan doesn’t have the authority to declassify anything, seeing as how he’s a former government employee and an all-around nobody these days.

Oh, and remember when Trump revoked Brennan’s security clearance last year? Well, it looks like Brennan’s buddies at the CIA never actually followed through. Leaky Brennan still has a security clearance to this day.

The Deep State is perfectly fine with leaking classified information to the media when it wants to smear its opponents. The unverified and false Russian potty dossier? Have at it, Buzzfeed! The president’s private phone calls to the leaders of Australia and Mexico? Here you go, New York Times! But when Trump wants to declassify information that will hurt them? Nooooooo!


Most Popular

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More



Most Popular
Sponsored Content

These content links are provided by Content.ad. Both Content.ad and the web site upon which the links are displayed may receive compensation when readers click on these links. Some of the content you are redirected to may be sponsored content. View our privacy policy here.

To learn how you can use Content.ad to drive visitors to your content or add this service to your site, please contact us at [email protected].

Family-Friendly Content

Website owners select the type of content that appears in our units. However, if you would like to ensure that Content.ad always displays family-friendly content on this device, regardless of what site you are on, check the option below. Learn More